Why I won't be seeing the new Borat movie


Just one reason of many, I'm sure: Borat film tricked poor village actors. Excerpt:

"Mr Tudorache, a deeply religious grandfather who lost his arm in an accident, was one of those who feels most humiliated. For one scene, a rubber sex toy in the shape of a fist was attached to the stump of his missing arm - but he had no idea what it was.

Only when The Mail on Sunday visited him did he find out. He said he was ashamed, confessing that he only agreed to be filmed because he hoped to top up his £70-a-month salary - although in the end he was paid just £3.

He invited us into his humble home and brought out the best food and drink his family had. Visibly disturbed, he said shakily: 'Someone from the council said these Americans need a man with no arm for some scenes. I said yes but I never imagined the whole country, or even the whole world, will see me in the cinemas ridiculed in this way. This is disgusting.'"

The media seem to be getting a kick out of pretending to debate the question "is this groundbreaking cinema or just over-the-top offensive profiteering?" To me, at least, it's clearly the latter, and I have no reason to spend money on it.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Have something to say about that? Read and add comments below.

Related Posts

If you thought that was interesting, you might also enjoy these related posts:

This page is part of my weblog, which is a part of my personal website.

Discussion
and Links

Join the discussion by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Prev:
Next:

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting. I reserve the right to moderate submitted comments.

Your comment:

Reader Comments

It is, indeed, "just over-the-top offensive profiteering." My money will stay in my wallet on this one, as well!