Richmond Indiana's Eastern Cross


Indiana CrossIf you've visited Richmond, Indiana via interstate 70 recently, it's likely you've seen a new addition to our most prominent landmarks: a 110-foot vinyl-sided cross right next to the highway exit on our east side.  The cross was erected at a cost of US$150,000 by New Creations Chapel, Inc., which has a website dedicated to the project's history and progress.  Their hope is that it "will give hope, direction, light from above, and encouragement to all those people traveling Interstate 70 and passing New Creations Chapel."

Richmond already has a number of issues with public perception when it comes to tourism and first impressions.  All discussions of religion and symbology aside, I think this new fixture probably doesn't help with that.  But the main question that came up in the casual discussions I've had with people about it is "how does such a thing go up without the community having any input on it?"  To answer that question I contacted Scott Zimmerman, who works as a City Planner with the City of Richmond.

Here's what he had to say:

Under our Zoning Code, R-1 One-Family Residence District allows as Principal
Permitted Uses Institutional uses including churches. That would include all
church uses unless specifically prohibited or further regulated somewhere in
code. Under our sign code, things like flags and monuments are not
considered signs. If this were part of a church building (steeple) it would
be regulated. This is also why the Ford dealership has a similarly large
flag pole which has no review through our office.

The only permit required was an Improvement Location Permit (ILP) verifying
setbacks and zoning.

So, there you have it.  My understanding is that the zoning code is changing soon in a way that might require a little more oversight from the City before such large items are put up, but I don't know the details of that.

What do you think about a symbol like this as an introduction to Richmond for travelers, visitors and residents?  Is it a good and appropriate use of $150,000?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Have something to say about that? Read and add comments below.

Related Posts

If you thought that was interesting, you might also enjoy these related posts:

This page is part of my weblog, which is a part of my personal website.

Discussion
and Links

Join the discussion by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Prev:
Next:

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting. I reserve the right to moderate submitted comments.

Your comment:

Reader Comments

Signs and symbols always seem like frivolous uses of money. Fancy signs in front of colleges adn churches and hospitals, logos on shirts and shoes, calling mutts "designer dogs," etc. Given the other things New Creations spends its money on -- "educating" students out of workbooks, taking in kids who can barely read but CAN play basketball, and oh lest we forget...staging horrific halloween hell house events... given all that? The cross seems fairly benign.

Besides, the McDonald's arch, at least from some vantage points, rises quite a bit higher.

What I would love to see is one of the Quaker churches erect a giant peace symbol. Or a Unitarian church put up a huge rainbow flag.

I think it's a ridiculous waste of $150,000, especially in a city that's struggling financially like Richmond... I would think a good Christian organization could have put that money to better "more Christian" uses in our community

I was disappointed when I came home to visit my family and see this HUGE waste of money. It reminds me of the TV evangelists and their oppressive views upon the masses. I thought this part of Indiana was the Corn Belt of even the Rust Belt. Has the Bible Belt taken over with their backward, biggoted and oppressive views?

I do attend church on the west coast but our congregation raises money for Haitian victims and sends Mosquito nets to Africa instead erecting "Golden Calves".