Blog

I recently received my DVD copy of local filmmaker Zack Parker’s latest film, Scalene.  This is my review (partly of the film and partly of the making of the film), which doesn’t contain any plot spoilers but may still affect your own viewing experience if you read it first.

Scalene is a dark thriller that tells a story of a mother, her son, and the son’s caretaker as they interact around some events that change their lives significantly.  The film shows the perspectives of each of the three characters using a combination of linear (forward and reverse) and non-linear story-telling, a technique that certainly keeps things interesting and always a bit unsettling.

The movie was filmed in Richmond, and so as a resident it was also “fun” to try to pick out the locations and backdrops along the way – various scenes in the City building, various restaurants, Glen Miller Park, etc.  I’ve even been pulled over by one of the Richmond Police Department officers who makes an appearance in the film, but I don’t think that qualifies me for an on-screen credit.

Continue Reading

That title really roped you in, huh?  Allow me to explain.

Earlier today I attended the Indiana University 2012 Business Outlook Panel in its visit to Richmond.  It’s a group that “has presented national, state, and local economic forecasts for the coming year to business, political, and community leaders of Indiana” for the last 38 years.  I attended the same gathering back in 2005 and I have to say that today’s commentary wasn’t much different from what it was six years ago: “things are not great with the economy, but there are reasons to be cautiously optimistic.”

As I noted in my reflections from the 2005 event, there were a couple of troubling ideas that permeated the remarks, especially from the panelists looking at global and national trends.

Continue Reading

In today’s election, the citizens of Richmond made a choice about who they want to help shape the future of this community in the coming years. While I am of course disappointed that I was not elected to City Council, I am grateful for the votes I did receive and for the amazing support I’ve had along the way.

Some highlights from the unofficial results [PDF]:

• 5,945 voters voted
• 2,717 of those voted for me to be one of the three members of City Council At-Large, 201 votes short of a win

This has been my first foray into politics, and it’s been an incredibly rewarding journey. As I’ve walked through neighborhoods in Richmond, I’ve had a chance to hear from residents here what issues matter most to them. As I’ve sat down with community leaders and decision-makers, I’ve learned about the complexities of building a thriving city in tough economic times. As I’ve talked with supporters and members of the media, I’ve enjoyed being challenged to communicate my hopes and views concisely and authentically. In these last nine plus months I’ve come to appreciate how much important work there is to do in this great town, and how many opportunities we have to make it better.

I congratulate the winners of today’s election, and wish them the very best as they take office or continue in their existing roles. I ask each of them to stay true to the promises they’ve made during this election, and to hold themselves accountable to the ideas and vision that they set forth in their campaigns.

My campaign would not have been possible without the gracious support and enthusiasm of those who have lent their time and talents in many forms:

Continue Reading

The Palladium-Item has an article out today noting an increase in homicides here over the last year compared to previous years.

I want to be careful to say that I don’t write about this trend in this space with any promise or implication that my election or anyone else’s could prevent individual crimes or save lives.  We know that no elected official and not even the best trained and funded police forces can prevent individual violent crimes when there are so many other background factors that go into these horrific events.

But I think our reaction to this trend as a community will speak greatly about our future prospects for building a version of Richmond that is safe, vibrant and thriving.

Continue Reading

As a part of conversation amongst candidates for office in this election, some of us found that there was a common theme emerging about our emphasis on and commitment to honoring and upholding basic principles of elected office.

That conversation has resulted in the creation of “A Pledge to Voters” – a promise that myself and several other candidates – including Libertarian candidate Matt Hisrich and Republican candidate Misty Hollis – are making as a way of indicating our commitment to honesty, diligence, transparency and respect. We might hope that these values are a given for our elected officials, but in today’s political climate I think it’s important to reaffirm our commitment to them, especially as we ask for the public trust in return.

The full text of the pledge is below.  I thank Matt and Misty for their commitments today, and I would encourage all of my fellow candidates for Council to sign on to this pledge, even at this late stage of the campaign, to show their commitment to these values if they are elected or re-elected. Continue Reading

One of the things I’ve gained during this campaign is a new appreciation for how challenging it can be to produce and facilitate a meaningful and substantive political debate that is valuable to voters.  Between the spring primary and the general election, I can think of at least eight events where myself and some combination of other candidates for office were asked to debate (or converse, or discuss) the issues facing Richmond and Wayne County for an hour or more.

At each event, as a candidate I’ve tried to balance a series of (sometimes competing) goals for my participation, including:

Continue Reading

A recent editorial in the Palladium-Item again called for candidates in this City election to provide more detail about the specific changes and tasks we will take on if elected to improve City finances and the community as a whole.

I feel confident that in my own campaign I’ve provided a thorough look at how I would approach my role as a member of City Council.  I’ve posted a consolidated list of my views on a number of issues facing the community, I’ve continued to post updates and more thorough commentary on the topics that have emerged in this election, and part of my history in this community as a volunteer is some extensive writings on my personal website about Richmond and our approach to governance and community building.

Continue Reading

Last night was the second scheduled event during the general election cycle when candidates for an at-large position on City Council got together to answer questions from people in the community about issues facing Richmond.  More so than the Chamber-sponsored debates last week, I thought the questions posed by attendees revealed a lot about what’s on the hearts and minds of members of our community.

We were asked about education, access to affordable housing, how to pay for proposed improvements in City government, the local Latino population, the community’s relationship with its workers, what we can do to keep more college graduates here, whether Council members should be injecting themselves into private business decisions, and more.

But I think the one question that was probably most  piercing for all of us was from Toivo Asheeke, who asked what we as Council members would do to restore a sense of hope and empowerment to people who live in Richmond.  It’s a huge, important, emotional question, and as Toivo was quoted as saying in today’s Palladium-Item, our answers as candidates were indeed “insufficient.”

As candidates running for one seat on a 9-seat local legislative body in a small city in the Midwestern U.S., it might be tempting to shrug off the call to play a role in restoring hope and empowerment in our citizens.  And politicians should rightly be careful to make promises they can’t keep – if you believed the statements that sometimes came out of President Obama’s election campaign, for example, as soon as he was sworn in there was going to be so much hope and empowerment flowing in the streets we’d choke on it; how’s that working out for us?

But I do think restoring hope and a sense of empowerment is something City Council can impact here in Richmond, and that’s what I said last night:

Continue Reading

As complex human beings, it can be hard to communicate all that we stand for and all that we’ve experienced in casual social interactions.  ”Hi, I’m Chris, let me tell you about the past 34 years of my life in the next 2 minutes….”  When it goes beyond communicating to trying to persuade someone of something – that they should vote for you, for example – it can be even harder to efficiently sum up what you’re about in meaningful, authentic ways.

This is surely part of the utility, then, of having political parties: “Democrat,” “Republican” and “Libertarian” (to name a few) are labels that help us identify a set of beliefs and values that a particular candidate might stand for and bring to their approach to governance.

But in recent years, the wordsmiths of the political machine have diluted many of these labels, and candidates and politicians who say they stand for one thing and then do other things have further made those labels less meaningful to voters. And just because we have labels to help us, we can’t forfeit our responsibility to truly understand what a candidate stands for and how they would represent us.

This is where the “So What?” test comes in.

Continue Reading

At some point when I was fairly young, I was excited to learn about the concept of “truth in advertising” – the notion that it actually matters whether what you say in a public announcement or description of products or services is true or not.  I was even more excited to learn that there was an official government entity (in the U.S., the Federal Trade Commission) empowered to enforce truth in advertising standards, and punish those who would dare publish falsehoods.  It totally knocked my socks off to further learn that ordinary citizens could submit claims of false advertising and compel advertisers to change or withdraw their deceptive advertising pieces.

What a world of pure and unflinching justice we could then live in!  To walk around knowing that the slogans and invitations on billboards, newspaper ads and television were all required by law to be true, and that onerous fines and the shame of the public eye awaited the occasional miscreant who would stray from this noble code.  No need to worry about being deceived or misled as a consumer; we could always have confidence that advertisers would stand by their claims.

Like I said, I was young.

But at the risk of sounding curmudgeonly, I do think there’s been a notable shift in the standards we hold marketers and public figures to when it comes to truth in advertising.  Seems like somewhere around the mid 1990′s, we kind of gave up on it.

Continue Reading